![]() |
![]() |
Home |
News |
Sports |
Business |
Entertainment |
Classifieds | |||||
| Columnists | Autos | Homes | Careers | Lifestyles | Ebert | Search | ||||||
| mobile | email edition | printer friendly | email article | ||||||
![]() Today's news Archive Census Commentary Editorials Education Elections Lottery Obituaries Politics Religion Special sections Weather War on Terror Special Report: Iraq ![]() Andrade Brown Falsani Greeley Higgins Jackson Kupcinet Laney Martire Mitchell Neal Novak Ontiveros O'Rourke O'Sullivan Pickett Quick Takes Richards Roeper Roeser Sneed Steinberg Steyn Sweet Washington Will Wiser Other Views ![]() |
February 9, 2003
BY DAVID MCGRATH
If you're the only lawyer in the family, guess who gets the late-night
phone call when cousin Michael fails the Breathalyzer or after Uncle Nick
receives a tax audit in the mail?
Similarly, if you're the English teacher of the clan, you're the one
whom a frantic Aunt Muriel calls when the term paper her first-born needs
to do for high school graduation is due tomorrow.
So as a writing instructor at College of DuPage, I wasn't surprised to
receive a call from a relative whose child was having trouble with term
papers for several of his classes. But when I learned that the student was
my nephew who is a senior at DePaul University, I did a double take.
The first surprise was his getting D's on his writing drafts.
Intelligent and articulate, my nephew reads two and sometimes three books
a week. Immersed in texts and ideas, he was the last young person I
figured would have difficulty in communicating.
The second shock was over the fact that he or any other student could
advance to the threshold of graduation at a prestigious university like
DePaul without an apparent writing disability being exposed until his
fourth year.
As it turned out, though, DePaul was not negligent, for he spent the
first two years at one of our south suburban community colleges, where he
earned A's and B's for most of freshman and sophomoregeneral education
courses, including two required writing classes, Composition 101 and 102.
Even better news was that he was not possessed of any writing
dysfunction. Although his DePaul history professor bluntly told him that
he ''couldn't write,'' my nephew had simply never developed an adequate
sense of audience, nor the concomitant skill in using transitions to
present his ideas clearly in an essay.
Therefore, it took us only several sit-downs over his papers to
diagnose his writing problem and steer him to earning good grades on the
remainder of his essays. Helping an accomplished, reading, thinking
student like him was like tapping slightly on the accelerator of an
expensive, finely tuned automobile.
How was it possible, then, that his first two years at the local
community college from which he transferred did not prepare him
sufficiently for the rigors of a four-year university? The blame was not
neglect by his teachers, but an Illinois community college system that has
failed to keep up with the times.
To explain: Twenty years ago, the typical junior college composition
teacher in this state had four classes with 25 to 30 pupils each. Teaching
more than 100 different students to write at college level was an
ambitious mission, and teachers were up to the task. Students wrote and
wrote, and teachers read and read, marking up papers, recommending
revisions, and conferencing with individuals at all stages until they got
it right.
But today, with students from homes that read less or not at all, and
who enter college with SAT scores for verbal skills 40 points lower than
in 1975 (according to the Center for Education Reform), community college
composition teachers have the same number of students as they had two
decades ago!
Even though the National Council of Teachers of English and the
Conference on College Composition and Communication recommend a maximum of
15 students in a composition class, and no more than 60 students
altogether per term, Illinois classes remain overloaded, with 25 per class
at the College of DuPage, 32 at Moraine Valley and 33 at Joliet Junior
College. These are nearly the same numbers as 20 years ago, but students
require twice the amount of attention and clock hours to make the grade.
The situation would be analogous to college trustees asking the track
coach to repeat a championship season, but this year with a crop of
runners whose times for the mile average 40 seconds slower!
Surely, my nephew's English teachers had possessed advanced degrees and
a wealth of experience and skill in teaching the fine art of writing, for
which a student needs intensive planning, practice, revision, feedback and
expert guidance. But at the fairly typical Illinois community college he
attended, his instructors have class loads of more than 120 students per
term--more than twice what the NCTE recommends. Is it difficult to imagine
how my nephew's individual learning needs were not met?
Teacher morale is sinking. Student writing is god-awful and getting
worse. Band-Aids like writing centers and peer tutoring programs have been
applied. But it will take a more significant commitment to literacy by
community college trustees, and a redirection of funds to reduce class
loads so that teachers can give their students the help they need to
succeed.
Community colleges boast rightfully about maintaining currency in
computer instruction and business-related education, in order to better
serve the immediate community. How about getting into the 21st century for
reading and writing?
David McGrath is a free-lance writer and teacher at College of
DuPage.
|
|
|
| ||
News | Sports | Business | Entertainment | Lifestyles | Classifieds Visit our online partners: Daily Southtown Pioneer Press Suburban Chicago Newspapers Post-Tribune Star Newspapers Jerusalem Post Daily Telegraph Copyright 2003, Digital Chicago Inc. |
| |||||