![]() |
Tone |
||
I can recall the idea of "tone" being very hard to grasp and then discuss when I studied poetry as a young student. Even today after working with language and literature for 35 years, my sense that "tone" is difficult to explain remains. One may be sensitive to tone without being able to define precisely what one is noticing that tells one the poem is angry or bitter or stoic or awe struck. Moreover, we are often aware that tones can shift and be directed toward different elements that comprise the poem. One way to gain entry into the subtleties of tone is to remember that tone is a matter of voice. Tone speaks. When we are (or were) told by our parents that they don't like the tone of voice we are using, they mean the way we are saying what we are saying--the sarcastic "sorry" or the angry "all right!" Tone is what allows us to say a word such as "well" in many different ways--each of which might announce a different mood or interpretation of a situation. In life, the interpretation of tone is supported by other cues or clues, a raised eyebrow or the tilt of one's head. In writing we do not have such cues--emoticons notwithstanding. How can a reader tell if one is on the right track with tone? We can recall the advice given regarding symbols. It has applicability to this question. We look for evidence in various places so that a pattern is formed. We look for support in the images and what they suggest, in the language itself, the words chosen and their connotations, in the rhythm and syntax and its effects. In short, the poem as a totality supports the interpretation of its tone. That is why assessment of tone is such an art itself; one is noticing the "how" of the poem in addition to its content or "what" of the poem. Moreover, an interpretation of authorial tone can be derived from an awareness of the total context of the poem's occasion for having been written. Such is the case with Dryden's [Why should a foolish marriage vow], a discussion of which is on this page. http://www.cod.edu/people/faculty/fitchf/readlit/poesitspocc.htm If one reads the poem aloud, as one gives expression to the voice of the speaker of the poem one can hear the tones the poem invites in one's own voice. This is, in my estimation, one great avenue into the tone of a poem. Therefore, readers should always try to discover tone in the act of reading aloud. Here, for example, is a link to Audre Lorde's poem, "Hanging Fire" as well as to a terrific set of suggestions for reading, rereading and analyzing this poem. As you read the poem, think especially about the tone of the youthful speaker. Think about how young people talk. Are all the complaints and concerns being given voice here to be said in the same tone or are they best articulated with more inflections that vary from the profound to the more trivial? Or would an adolescent not make those very distinctions since "I should have been on Math Team/ my marks were better than his" may seem as profound as "suppose I die before graduation/ they will sing sad melodies/ but finally/ tell the truth about me." Decisions about the speaker and her tone will happen as we read Lorde's poem aloud and, as Rich says above, "let them [the words] enter our souls and mix with the juices of our minds." Suggestion for a small group tone project: See if you can find a small group for this. Each person should read and prepared one poem that strikes you as particularly effective or interesting that you want to share with the group. Make sure you give them to each other before you meet. Then contact each other and "discuss" your poems. Try to talk in detail to each other about images, lines, meanings, impressions of the speaker and his or her tone for your chosen poems. It might make it more interesting to do this on the phone (three way calling?) or online in a chat room. Of course, each of you should have read each other's poems. When you talk about the poems, select three or four words or phrases or images which you feel are crucial for the interpretation of tone and try to explain why. Once you have done that (or before and after, if you like) each person is to record his or her poem on tape or on disc, reading aloud and capturing as much of the appropriate tone as possible. Send each other the results! It is fun to do this. One can also try out poems with similar subjects but very different tones. That might make a set! Two tone projects for Elizabeth Bishop: Project #1
Project #2 Go to the Atlantic Online Poetry Pages for Bishop http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/poetry/soundings/bishop.htm This page treats Bishop's poem "Sonnet." Scroll down to the poem itself. Read it. Then one by one, listen to the different readings which Gail Mazur, Robert Pinsky, Llyod Schwartz, and Mark Strand have given the poem. Listen to them several times. How do their varied vocal inflections and tones reveal how they interpret the poem? Are you more attentive to the poem and your own reading of it after having heard theirs? Do you understand it better? You might journal on the differences among them and on your own feelings. Try recording the poem yourself. More links
|
||
|
Home Copyright © 2002 College of DuPage Communications/Liberal Arts · IC3121f · (630) 942-2793 fitchf@cdnet.cod.edu Disclaimer |