![]() |
| What Works for You?
|
||
|
We can count works, but what works count? Many who believe that reading works of literature is essential to an education and not simply enjoyment believe that a reader should spend time with works that have been "approved," that have withstood the so-called "test of time," that are part of what is termed the "canon," which is a list of such traditionally accepted works of literature.
In describing your repertoire, it might be important to decide if your reading has been from the so-called "canon" or if it has been from the millions of other works available. Clearly a description of your repertoire should be doable without the necessity of these judgments. But it is exceedingly difficult to do so. For example, whether or not you have decided you read a lot or a little, there seems to be implied the cultural judgment that one SHOULD read a lot. For a very long time being "well-read" has been associated with being well educated. Beliefs of this sort are part of a culture's literary ideology. From this ideology we tend to make lists and award prizes for best works. Below you will find websites that deliver lists that suggest "greatness" of one sort or another.
The American Library Association also publishes lists of "bests."
Then again, many local libraries publish lists to help their readers find worthwhile reading.
Search these lists. Give yourself one point for each work you have read. (If you feel really industrious, copy and paste the titles you find into a list. You can use it later.)
Write a Description of Your Repertoire: After this review of "lists" and thoughts of things not on the lists, you are ready to compose a statement on the nature and the depth and breadth of your repertoire. You might do this in a brief prose or journal format or you might try a reader's resume. If you want to write a Reader's Resume, go to explore some ideas for Writing a Reader's Resume You might also want to write a Reader's Story. |
||